Re: MFC and Borland IDE

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc

Article #1978

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Previous Next

#1978

From: Jon Waette
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 19:49

17 lines
1157 bytes

In <61589@aurs01.UUCP> lynch@aurs01.uucp (David Lynch) writes:

>Ok, most of us agree that the Microsoft MFC class library is
>superior to Borland's OWL for windows programming, and the
>Borland windows IDE is light years ahead of the Microsoft PWB

I heard Borland was a better (easier?) framework than MFC.
MFC is not an application framework worth the name, it's
just a collection of loosely related classes and you need
a LOT of extra work to do anything non-trivial in MFC.

Or does it have a turbo mode I didn't notice? :-)

-- 
 -- Jon W{tte, h+@nada.kth.se, Mac Hacker Deluxe --

   There's no sex act that can't be made better with Yell-O.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec16.194955.19597@kth.se>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth.se!dront.nada.kth.se!d88-jwa

References: <61589@aurs01.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth.se!dront.nada.kth.se!d88-jwa
From: d88-jwa@dront.nada.kth.se (Jon Waette)
Subject: Re: MFC and Borland IDE
Message-ID: <1992Dec16.194955.19597@kth.se>
Sender: usenet@kth.se (Usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: dront.nada.kth.se
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
References: <61589@aurs01.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 19:49:55 GMT
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message