Re: MFC and Borland IDE

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc

Article #2023

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Previous Next

#2023

From: Jon Wätte
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:35

20 lines
1450 bytes

In <1992Dec18.050925.5363@panix.com> rryan@panix.com (Rob Ryan) writes:

>>MFC is not an application framework worth the name, it's
>>just a collection of loosely related classes and you need

>I've heard this claim before, but having only used MFC I can't speak
>authoritatively on OWL.  I know that developing non-trivial MFC apps
>is not hard, but if OWL makes it a lot easier, I'd like to know.  Can

Maybe I should have been more clear.

Is there anything resembling, say, MacApp for the Macintosh
for Windows? Or do I have to wait for Bedrock to get a decent
application framework? Or write one on my own? (Not likely :-)

-- 
 -- Jon W{tte, h+@nada.kth.se, Mac Hacker Deluxe --
 Engineering: "How will this work?" Science: "Why will this work?" Management:
 "When will this work?"  Liberal Arts: "Do you want fries with that?"
                     -- Jesse N. Schell

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec18.173536.23062@kth.se>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth.se!dront.nada.kth.se!d88-jwa

References: <61589@aurs01.UUCP> <1992Dec16.194955.19597@kth.se> <1992Dec18.050925.5363@panix.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth.se!dront.nada.kth.se!d88-jwa
From: d88-jwa@dront.nada.kth.se (Jon Wätte)
Subject: Re: MFC and Borland IDE
Message-ID: <1992Dec18.173536.23062@kth.se>
Sender: usenet@kth.se (Usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: dront.nada.kth.se
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
References: <61589@aurs01.UUCP> <1992Dec16.194955.19597@kth.se> <1992Dec18.050925.5363@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:35:36 GMT
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message