Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
Article #2123CommonView vs. C++/Views
From: Tom Haapanen
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:51
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:51
15 lines
1124 bytes
1124 bytes
We're looking at both of these packages, and both look potentially quite attractive. It's impossible to tell, though, whether they're bug-free, comprehensive and well-supported without actually using them for something non-trivial. If you've used either (or better yet, both) of these packages, could you describe your experiences? Incomplete APIs, bugs, tech support, anything else that's important? Posting followups is probably the best; I expect there are others out there who'd be interested in this as well... [ \tom haapanen "i don't even know what street canada is on" -- al capone ] [ tomh@wes.on.ca "trust the programmer" -- ansi c standard ] [ waterloo engineering software "to thine own self be true" -- polonius ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov18.175123.25365@wes.on.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!skule.ecf!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watserv1!wes.on.ca!tomhShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!skule.ecf!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watserv1!wes.on.ca!tomh From: tomh@wes.on.ca (Tom Haapanen) Subject: CommonView vs. C++/Views Organization: Waterloo Engineering Software Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:51:23 GMT Message-ID: <1992Nov18.175123.25365@wes.on.ca> Lines: 15