re: CA: Realizer vs. Visual Basic

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc

Article #2373

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Previous Next

#2373

From: neff123
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 23:32

14 lines
1034 bytes

>What is the more powerful, easy, and complete programming
>tool, CA:Realizer or Visual Basic?

I use VB 2.0 and I love it.  It may have some limitations but I 
haven't bumped up against them yet.  Sorry, no experience with 
CA:Realizer.  However, I can direct you to the Dec. 1992 issue of 
Byte for a comparison of VB, CA:Realizer and GFA-BASIC.  They 
review VB 1.0 but include a blurb about 2.0.  I used 1.0 and 
find 2.0 a big improvement: MDI, multi-select file windows, etc.

Also, there are many 3rd party add-ons for VB.

I'm not sure what VB Pro offers.  I decided I couldn't afford 
it anyway...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1k4hlr$ri5@agate.berkeley.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!neff123

References: <weiss.728085423@cwis>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!neff123
From: neff123@garnet.berkeley.edu ()
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
Subject: re: CA: Realizer vs. Visual Basic
Date: 26 Jan 1993 23:32:11 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <1k4hlr$ri5@agate.berkeley.edu>
References: <weiss.728085423@cwis>
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu

Reply to Parent Message