Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
Article #2630Re: Windows 3.1 LZEXPAND DLL
From: death
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 01:32
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 01:32
25 lines
1662 bytes
1662 bytes
John Grant (jagrant@emr1.emr.ca) wrote: : In article <1993Jan07.185848.23956@microsoft.com> dwightm@microsoft.com (Dwight Matheny) writes: : However, the bad news is that it would appear to be : not compatible with the version of compress on Unix : systems. I compressed an ASCII file with both the : MS compress and the Unix compress and while the compression : amounts were similar, the contents of the files were not : even close. I dumped the Unix-compressed file and most of : it was unreadable binary stuff. On the other hand, the : MS-compressed file was partially readable. : : So what gives here? Is it the same algorithm or not? Are : they compatible or not? Why not!!!!!!!!!! Shouldn't : MS's compress.exe be renamed to mscomp.exe so it : won't get confused with the 'real' compress utility? NO - it is not compatible with the unix version, nor was it intended to be. A most of the DOS users in the world DO NOT use unix, and are therefore not confused. -- ========================================================================= WANTED: Position for experienced Matrix runner. Demanding and ambitious positions welcome. Must have support for a FUCHI XNN1-11-22 cyberdeck. =========================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<79575@hydra.gatech.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!prism!gtd543aReferences:
<1993Jan8.003723.10831@emr1.emr.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!prism!gtd543a From: gtd543a@prism.gatech.EDU (death) Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 LZEXPAND DLL Message-ID: <79575@hydra.gatech.EDU> Date: 9 Jan 93 01:32:03 GMT References: <1993Jan8.003723.10831@emr1.emr.ca> Organization: Purgatory Lines: 25 X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5