🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <8157cb$d3817.364@microforum>, adrian@microforum.com (Adrian
Sampaleanu) wrote:

> I'm investigating version control systems for our medium sized project.  I've 
> used ancient versions of PVCS and MKS RCS.  I have a recent Test Drive
version 
> of MKS's Source Integrity.
> 
> Can anyone share their opinions on these and other competing products?  I'd 
> prefer a product with a Win95 style interface.  Source Integrity is
close, but 
> it has a few quirks (although my version is from Feb 95, so there might be 
> newer stuff from MKS).
> 
> I'm especially interested to find out about Microsoft's new version control 
> system.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Adrian


I have used a DOS/OS2 only command line driven product called TLIB, which
works well. It keeps the archive in directories and files which mimic
those in the project

I have also used a product called SOURCESAFE from OneTree which has an MS
Windows interface and also works well. It keeps the archive in a data
structure which is only accessible by the program. There is, believe it or
not, a MAC version which can share the archive with provision for MAC
nameing, but the MAC version is command line driven. Microsoft bought
OneTree recently and I saw a notice that the MAC version was now supported
by someone other than Microsoft.