Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Article #143Application Frameworks vs. Turbo C++ Windows
From: Dave Plummer
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 14:38
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 14:38
13 lines
1279 bytes
1279 bytes
What comes with Borland C++ 3.1 with AF that does not come with Turbo C++ 3.1 for Windows? Since TC comes with OWL, and I have no need for TurboVision, what am I actually missing out on now that I got cheap and bought TC++? Secondly, there was a program for the Amiga called PowerWindows, and it let you do pretty much what resource workshop does for dialog boxes, but it also let you build controls in you main window (and generate skeleton code). I was surprised to find out that RW didn't do that, so I ordered protogen. Now it sounds like protogen doesn't do it either. Does everyone in the world hand-code their main window interfaces? - Dave
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug11.143830.4692@regina.cs.uregina.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!ubc-cs!unixg.ubc.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!access.usask.ca!regina!hercules.cs.uregina.ca!plummerShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!ubc-cs!unixg.ubc.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!access.usask.ca!regina!hercules.cs.uregina.ca!plummer From: plummer@hercules.cs.uregina.ca (Dave Plummer) Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools Subject: Application Frameworks vs. Turbo C++ Windows Message-ID: <1992Aug11.143830.4692@regina.cs.uregina.ca> Date: 11 Aug 92 14:38:30 GMT Sender: news@regina.cs.uregina.ca Reply-To: plummer@hercules.cs.uregina.ca (Dave Plummer) Organization: University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan Lines: 13 Originator: plummer@hercules.cs.uregina.ca