Has anyone seen this OWL problem?

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools

Article #146

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools Previous Next

#146

From: khanhmy hoang
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 08:07

13 lines
1001 bytes

	My program using Borland's OWL (statically linked) worked perfectly
	in Windows 3.0 and 3.1 when built using BC++ 3.0.
	When built using BC++ 3.1, the program crashes in Windows 3.0 but
	still works fine in Windows 3.1.

	I did define WIN30 during compilation, and this should give me backward
	compatibility. But this is not what I get.

	Specifically, the Attr data member of a TListBox control has valid
	values in Windows 3.1 but has 0's in Windows 3.0 (as watched in TDW).
	Apparently Attr has an invalid address in 3.0 and this gives me the UAE.

	Your help is much appreciated.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug12.080756.28348@leland.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!kmh

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!kmh
From: kmh@leland.Stanford.EDU (khanhmy hoang)
Subject: Has anyone seen this OWL problem?
Message-ID: <1992Aug12.080756.28348@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 08:07:56 GMT
Lines: 15