Re: MS C/C++ 7.0 and OS/2 - free update (Was: Borland 3.0 vs MSC 7.0 - Article 155 - go-pugleaf

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools

Article #155

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools Previous Next

Re: MS C/C++ 7.0 and OS/2 - free update (Was: Borland 3.0 vs MSC 7.0

#155

From: Keith Curtis
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 19:24

7 lines
1112 bytes

Well...  Watcom and Symantec/Zortech have both licensed MFC and Borland
has added a switch to their 3.1 product to change the interpretation of
the much discussed ambiguity that prevented their 3.0 product from compiling
MFC.  Sounds like an up-and-coming defacto standard to me.

Well, I don't know if thats true or not, but no matter.  Do you know if MFC will somehow encapsulate the support of threads in NT?  Also, I'm writing a TCP/IP application--will MFC encapsulate Winsock?  What about MAPI, LSAPI, etc for C7 under Windows/DOS?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <XNR-aD-@engin.umich.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!kcurtis

References: <Br6rDB.BBD@apollo.hp.com> <uFJRNB1w164w@olson.acme.gen.nz> <1992Jul19.035304.12551@microsoft.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!kcurtis
From: kcurtis@inthehat.engin.umich.edu (Keith Curtis)
Subject: Re: MS C/C++ 7.0 and OS/2 - free update (Was: Borland 3.0 vs MSC 7.0
Message-ID: <XNR-aD-@engin.umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 15:24:01 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
References: <Br6rDB.BBD@apollo.hp.com> <uFJRNB1w164w@olson.acme.gen.nz> <1992Jul19.035304.12551@microsoft.com>
Originator: kcurtis@inthehat.engin.umich.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: inthehat.engin.umich.edu
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message