Re: Microsoft C/C++ 7.0 versus Borland C++ 3.1

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools

Article #345

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools Previous Next

#345

From: Lance Andrewes
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 06:25

13 lines
935 bytes

eau@runx.oz.au writes in article <1992Aug29.024739.9311@runx.oz.au>:
> 
> We're trying to decide between Microsoft and Borland compilers
> as a standard compiler for building our products. We will use 
> both compilers during development - the question is which one 
> to use to generate the final .EXE. [etc]

There's a comprehensive review of C/C++ compilers in PC Magazine,
July 92, volume 11 number 13.

__
 _______  Email: lance@lancea.actrix.gen.nz
////      ZL2AJH    Wellington, New Zealand

Technical Details

Message-ID: <715242303snx@lancea.actrix.gen.nz>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!lancea!lance

References: <1992Aug29.024739.9311@runx.oz.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!lancea!lance
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Subject: Re: Microsoft C/C++ 7.0 versus Borland C++ 3.1
Message-ID: <715242303snx@lancea.actrix.gen.nz>
From: lance@lancea.actrix.gen.nz (Lance Andrewes)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 06:25:03 GMT
References: <1992Aug29.024739.9311@runx.oz.au>
Distribution: world
Organization: none
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message