Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Article #608Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Microsoft C/C++ 7.0
From: David Abbott
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:02
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:02
40 lines
2918 bytes
2918 bytes
Richard Kooijman (Richard.Kooijman@dnpap.et.tudelft.nl) wrote: : Now we are using C 6.0, which is as bug ridden as C 7.0 (a bit less : in fact, but they are both NOT professional compilers, but : over-priced do-it-yourself tools). : I admit we don't have 6.01 or 6.0A but Microsoft Netherlands wants you : to specifically point out where the bugs are in the compiler : otherwise you don't get a update. Go figure, that isn't our job! : We paid for a compiler but get something with bugs WE have to find! You want some bugs, just take a look at the file cl-7-bug.zip in the c directory of the SIMTEL20 msdos archives. It has half a dozen or so small demonstration files which show up serious bugs in MSC 7.0 and 6.0. According to the author, all the demonstration files work with C 6.01, none work with C 7.0, and some don't work with C 6.0. That's right, some of the bugs in 6.0 that were fixed in 6.01 are back again in 7.0. That sort of thing is unforgivable really. By the way, is that "get an update only if you can document a bug" a general Microsoft policy, or somehting peculiar to Microsoft Netherlands? Perhaps someone from Microsoft may care to comment! I havn't been following this thread, but let me say I'm not trying to promote Borland C++ either. Any company releasing a huge program like that with such a pathetic installation program needs to re-organise its priorities just a little. I keep thinking they've got to do it better soon, but alas each new release uses the same old "you work out exactly how much space your selections will take, then feed in every disk (whether its needed or not) and I'll install it for you but if you're wrong and end up just 1K short of space, I'll delete everything for you and you can start all over again" program! I could go on and on about all the deficiencies in Borland's install program but you've probably got the general idea by now! -- David Abbott | Email: dfa@rabbit.physiol.unimelb.edu.au School of Physics & Dept. of Physiology | Phone: +61-3-344-5465 The University of Melbourne, Australia. | Fax: Available on request.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1h5luvINNpc5@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU!rabbit.physiol.unimelb.edu.au!dfaReferences:
<richard.724767664@dutepp13>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU!rabbit.physiol.unimelb.edu.au!dfa From: dfa@rabbit.physiol.unimelb.edu.au (David Abbott) Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer,comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Microsoft C/C++ 7.0 Followup-To: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer,comp.windows.ms.programmer Date: 22 Dec 1992 00:02:39 GMT Organization: University of Melbourne Lines: 40 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1h5luvINNpc5@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU> References: <richard.724767664@dutepp13> NNTP-Posting-Host: rabbit.physiol.unimelb.edu.au X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]