Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Article #744Visual Basic vs. Quick C/Case:W vs. ???
From: David A. Bright
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:08
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:08
28 lines
1533 bytes
1533 bytes
I would like opinions (informed, please) on the relative merits of Visual Basic (especially V2.0) and Quick C/Case:W (or any other similar environment) for writing Windows programs. I am not interested in debates on the relative merits of the language itself (BASIC or C), but rather in the ability to quickly and easily develop programs with these packages. My areas of interest are: 1) Relatively small programs; several thousand lines would probably be largest. 2) Ability to use arbitrary DLLs required. 3) Ability to create DLLs desired. 4) Ease of development is high priority, especially with regard to user interface code. My time is precious and in short supply. 5) Cost of the package is important; the lower the better. 6) Royalty-free distribution required. 7) Execution speed is relatively low priority, as long as it isn't so bad that I can't stand to use the resulting applications. (This is subjective, I know) 8) Ability to create Windows .HLP files is strongly desired. Thanks for all the information you can give me. -- David A. Bright dab@Bright.MN.ORG (home) Secure Computing bright@SCTC.COM (work)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov17.150840.3438@sctc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!sctc.com!brightShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!sctc.com!bright From: bright@sctc.com (David A. Bright) Subject: Visual Basic vs. Quick C/Case:W vs. ??? Message-ID: <1992Nov17.150840.3438@sctc.com> Organization: SCTC Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:08:40 GMT Lines: 28