🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Nov16.162408.23622@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) writes...
> 
>You are apparently running an old version of Borland C++ (telling us
>the versions of Borland C++ and Windows you are running would have
>been helpful).  I am assuming you are running Borland C++ 3.0 and
>Windows 3.1 on these machines.  

	you're right on target: I am running BC++ 3.0 with Windows 3.1.

>You need to either patch the debugger
>(which still leaves some things not working quite well between Borland
>C++ and Windows 3.1, as I understand it) or you need to upgrade to the
>current version of Borland C++ (3.1).

	o rats! more $$$. the guys in the office won't be happy when they
	hear this... =-)
> 
>Just by the way, where did you get 3 OLD copies of Borland C++ that
>you are just now trying to load on machines?
> 
	My employer bought them. But then again, these copies 
	were bought a while back when they were coding for Windows 3.0.
	I guess upgrading the compiler was not high on their priority list...

>-- 
>"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
> in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.