🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Article #82

Re: Borland vs. 386Max - DING! DING!

#82
From: John Romkey
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 04:09
13 lines
1007 bytes
johnrp@well.sf.ca.us (John Panzer) wrote about problems with Borland's
C++ 3.1, and 386MAX from the Microsoft C/C++ 7.0 release.

I use 386MAX and Borland all the time. I use 386MAX 6.0, out of the
box, off the shelf, no problems. I also have a copy that came with my
MSC/C++ 7.0 update, but I've never had a reason to install it, and I
haven't really yet used MSC/C++ 7.0. I suspect that you need to tweak
your 386MAX or Windows configuration (if you're running BCC under
Windows) to deal with the problem, or perhaps there are
incompatabilities with later versions of 386MAX, and I've got an
earlier one.
-- 
	- john romkey	  ELF Communications	 romkey@ELF.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <360@asylum.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!asylum!romkey
References: <BsBK6M.GAu@well.sf.ca.us>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!asylum!romkey
From: romkey@asylum.UUCP (John Romkey)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Subject: Re: Borland vs. 386Max - DING! DING!
Message-ID: <360@asylum.UUCP>
Date: 3 Aug 92 04:09:49 GMT
References: <BsBK6M.GAu@well.sf.ca.us>
Distribution: na
Lines: 13