Re: any good words about zApp ?

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools

Article #830

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools Previous Next

#830

From: Joe Borkoles; Phd
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:04

17 lines
1286 bytes

In <93026.173852K77BC@CUNYVM.BITNET> <K77BC@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:

>   We're  thinking about buying zApp from Inmark inc.
>  zApp is our primary choice basically because of it's low cost.
>  Does anyone has anything to say about zApp. Or suggest any other
>  good and cheap c++ library for windows.

>Thanks.
>                -Yevgeny

Yes, I have used ZINC, Zapp, object-Menu, MFC and OWL. These are all
similar products with slightly different strenghts and weaknesses but
we have settled on Zapp and so far I have had no problem getting it
to perform some neat tricks. I like it in prefference to all the others
mentioned, except perhaps MFC but portability was a consideration so
Zapp was easily the best.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan27.200411.23212@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!qmw-dcs!borkoles

References: <93026.173852K77BC@CUNYVM.BITNET>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!qmw-dcs!borkoles
From: borkoles@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Joe Borkoles; Phd)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
Subject: Re: any good words about zApp ?
Message-ID: <1993Jan27.200411.23212@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
Date: 27 Jan 93 20:04:11 GMT
References: <93026.173852K77BC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Sender: usenet@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Organization: Computer Science Dept, QMW, University of London
Lines: 17
Nntp-Posting-Host: dillon.dcs.qmw.ac.uk

Reply to Parent Message