Re: Virtual Memory - does Win95 really know best ? - Article 155 - go-pugleaf

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.setup.win95

Article #155

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.setup.win95 Previous Next

Re: Virtual Memory - does Win95 really know best ?

#155

From: Chrisopher Bamford
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 00:00

14 lines
930 bytes

Paul Lynch (paul@p-s-b.demon.co.uk) wrote:

[snip]

: What are the reasons for not specifying a similar setup under Win95 ?

: Paul Lynch

Hi,

  I'd like to know as well please.

Chris.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1997Jan29.105158.8311@apiltd.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <32ee3aa0.176955@news.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10c888,cc611fe5a15c470b
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c888,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d516,cc611fe5a15c470b
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d516,public
From: chrisb@apiltd.demon.co.uk (Chrisopher Bamford)
Subject: Re: Virtual Memory - does Win95 really know best ?
Date: 1997/01/29
Message-ID: <1997Jan29.105158.8311@apiltd.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 212965952
references: <32ee3aa0.176955@news.demon.co.uk>
x-mail2news-user: news@apiltd.demon.co.uk
followup-to: comp.os.ms-windows.setup.win95,demon.ip.support.win95
x-mail2news-path: apiltd.demon.co.uk
organization: Atlas Products International Ltd.
newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup.win95,demon.ip.support.win95

Reply to Parent Message