Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Article #1118Re: Orchid Fahrenheit opinions / information requested
From: Wailer at the Gates of Dawn
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:37
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:37
20 lines
1357 bytes
1357 bytes
dutko@sysmgt.enet.dec.com (Nestor Dutko) writes: >Does anyone have any opinions with regard to the Orchid Fahrenheit 1280 card? >I'm also looking for the refresh rates at various resolutions (ok, primarily >at 1280x1024). Good card. Drivers are getting better, they were lame for a while. 1280x1024 is pushing it. 1280x1024x16 48Hz Interlaced. 1024x768 is MUCH better. 1024x768x256 70Hz The ATI Ultras are probally faster, but I've not played with them. Look into the #9 cards if you REALLY need 1280x1024 mode. My guess is that you actually don't. -- The Wailer at the Gates of Dawn | banshee@cats.UCSC.EDU | Just who ARE you calling a FROOFROO Head? | | DoD#0667 "Just a friend of the beast." | banshee@ucscb.UCSC.EDU | 2,3,5,7,13,17,19,31,61,89,107,127,521,607....| banshee@ucscb.BITNET |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1egtttINNm7c@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!cats.ucsc.edu!bansheeReferences:
<1992Nov18.192146.23615@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!cats.ucsc.edu!banshee From: banshee@cats.ucsc.edu (Wailer at the Gates of Dawn) Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup Subject: Re: Orchid Fahrenheit opinions / information requested Message-ID: <1egtttINNm7c@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> Date: 19 Nov 92 20:37:17 GMT References: <1992Nov18.192146.23615@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: am.ucsc.edu