🚀 go-pugleaf

>>	Winbench 2.5 results (in millions of Winmarks)
>>
>>Resolution	640x480		1024x768	1280x1024	VGA 640x480
>>Refresh		95hz		70hz		66hz
>>Pixeldepth	4	8	8	16	8		4
>>Colors		16	256	256	64k	256		16
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Results		29.1	29.0	30.6	17.9	30.4		8.1
>>

I later ran the tests in 8514 and Mach 8 modes, and got 10.2 and 16.4 million
winmarks, respectively. (1024x768x256)

>
>95Hz!!?  What kind of monitor do you have?  That must look like a sheet of
>paper or something!

Yes, it is quite clear and flicker-free, even with an all-white screen.  I'm
using the Gateway 2000 CrystalScan 1572 FS Monitor.  The setup program offered
2 settings for 72hz refresh, one of them produced a shrunken image.  When I
used the '>' and ']' keys to blow up the image, the refresh rate stepped up to
95hz.

>How do you all think the EISA version of the Ultra Pro will compare with these
>figures?  I suspect it'll be pretty much the same since the stuff that Win-
>Bench tests (line drawing, etc) don't care much about the speed of the bus.
>Perhaps on memory to screen copies the local bus version will be faster...no?

Well, I really don't know, because I have no experience with EISA systems.  It
should probably come within a few million winmarks.

>Oh, and BTW - I'm not sure, but I think you are violating a (somewhat 
>idiotic) licensing restriction by posting your WinBench results.

Oh well,....

-- 
===============================================================================
Daniel Matthew Coleman			  Internet: dcoleman@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin		Electrical/Computer Engineering
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------