Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Article #1201Re: Windows 3.1 on 486/33 - double buffering
From: Chaim Manaster
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 23:16
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 23:16
30 lines
1597 bytes
1597 bytes
>> If SmartDrive is unsure its
>>a good idea to install in anyway.
>
>I disagree. Trying it on my SCSI drive, the start-up time of windows
>doubles with double buffering installed. And this also reflects on all
Fine, but if you then discover that you needed double buffering,
what consequences have you suffered.
In other words, if your system needs double buffering and you did
not invoke it what disasters befall your system. Are these
consequences gradual, or do they occur in one fell swoop. Where do
you look to find these consequences that may or may not occur.
What is it about SCSI and ESDI drives (Ihave one of each) that
incur the wrath of no double buffering?
Thanks for the info.
Henry Manaster
--
***************************************************************************
Henry Manaster * EMail: manaster@yu1.yu.edu
Brooklyn, NY *
*
Disclaimer: The above is not necessarily MY opinion nor that
of anyone else :-) ????!
****************************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1329@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!alsys1!yu1.yu.edu!manasterReferences:
<1993Jan19.220908.2500@ucbeh.san.uc.edu> <14272@ecs.soton.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!alsys1!yu1.yu.edu!manaster From: manaster@yu1.yu.edu (Chaim Manaster) Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 on 486/33 - double buffering Message-ID: <1329@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu> Date: 24 Jan 93 23:16:41 GMT References: <1993Jan19.220908.2500@ucbeh.san.uc.edu> <14272@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Sender: news@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu Organization: School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, UCLA Lines: 30 Nntp-Posting-Host: yu1.yu.edu