Article View: comp.os.msdos.apps
Article #2755Opinions on Lotus 4 Windows
From: Ken Yee
Date: Sun, 26 May 1991 04:28
Date: Sun, 26 May 1991 04:28
11 lines
862 bytes
862 bytes
Has anyone seen or used 1-2-3 for Windows? (It's not out yet.) If anyone knows a Beta tester, I'm just looking for an answer like: "Excellent", "Sucko", "Yawn", "Better/Worse than Excel 3.0", "Better/Worse than Quattro for Windows", etc. I'm just wondering if it's worth waiting a while longer before deciding on a super-duper Spreadsheet with bolted-on database, presentation generator, and kitchen sink... :-) Ken (kenyee@ksr.com or uunet!ksr!kenyee)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3722@ksr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!world!ksr!kenyee@ksr.comShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!world!ksr!kenyee@ksr.com From: kenyee@ksr.com (Ken Yee) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps Subject: Opinions on Lotus 4 Windows Message-ID: <3722@ksr.com> Date: 26 May 91 04:28:55 GMT Article-I.D.: ksr.3722 Sender: news@ksr.com Distribution: na Organization: Kendall Square Research Corp. Lines: 11