Re: Intel CodeBuilder

Article View: comp.os.msdos.desqview

Article #1833

Back to comp.os.msdos.desqview Previous Next

#1833

From: Gary Rich
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 22:28

17 lines
1087 bytes

In article <8390@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
>In article <1993Jan08.215255.5697@qdeck.com> garyrich@qdeck.com (Gary Rich) writes:
>
>As much as it pains me to admit it (for I argued your side here about a year
>ago), DPMI is the wave of the future, and folks that ignore it will get run
>over.

I must agree.  DPMI is what's happening.  I just don't like it.  I'm running
QDPMI right now, sinve Borland C++ 3.1 needs it.  DPMI will probably even
be a good scheme someday.  Maybe by version 2.0.....

-- 
: Gary Rich : garyrich@qdeck.com
	    :: for tech support- support@qdeck.com
:           : for info        - info@qdeck.com
:

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan11.222812.20892@qdeck.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!qdeck!garyrich

References: <1993Jan7.174746.151@umr.edu> <1993Jan08.215255.5697@qdeck.com> <8390@lib.tmc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!qdeck!garyrich
From: garyrich@qdeck.com (Gary Rich)
Subject: Re: Intel CodeBuilder
Organization: Quarterdeck Office Systems, Santa Monica CA
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 22:28:12 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Jan11.222812.20892@qdeck.com>
References: <1993Jan7.174746.151@umr.edu> <1993Jan08.215255.5697@qdeck.com> <8390@lib.tmc.edu>
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message