Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc
Article #17Re: Quality of DR-DOS 6.0 Software and Service
From: boyd johnson
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 21:35
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 21:35
46 lines
2649 bytes
2649 bytes
In article <Oct27.183910.64363@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> knepley@CS.ColoState.EDU (Ranseus (Jim Knepley)) writes: >In article <1992Oct27.174247.11260@cs.uwp.edu> yusuf@cs.uwp.edu (Muhammad Yusuf) writes: > >I agree with you, but EVERYONE (regardless of DOS brand) should use >a "real" memory manager like QEMM or 386Max. OK, if you don't have >a '386, that'll be a problem, but 386sx seems to be the min these days. I used QEMM when I was using MS-DOS 5, but once I installed DR DOS 6 I had more free conventional memory with the built-in EMM386 than with MS-DOS 5 + QEMM, so I haven't bothered loading QEMM and risk possible compatibility problems with programs. >>DR DOS 6.0 is only a temporary legacy of performance, pretty >>soon MS-DOS 5.0 will check up some of the features of DR DOS and >>eventually you will see DR DOS 6.0 die off like an old legend of the >>past. So DR DOS won't live long - that's my theory. > >True enough, DR DOS 6.0 will be replaced with Novell DOS 7.0 (maybe >they'll keep the DR moniker, who knows), and Microsoft will still >be chasing their asses down because they've been blown off by >a superior product. Here's an excerpt from an article I submitted back in July. It's from about a 1/4 page article I distilled down to this. #According to Computer Reseller News April 20, 1992: # #Within 12 months ... DR DOS 7.0 will offer true pre-emptive multitasking, #allowing appilcations to continue operating in the background until the #operating system interrupts them, sources said. #... #Though DR DOS 7.0 will not be a 32-bit operating system, it will #incorporate some 386-specific instructions, and will provide an option #permitting certain DOS applications to run in protected mode, providing #nearly unrestricted memory, sources said. # #In addition, the product will include tighter NetWare integration, #including more instrumentation of the operating system for network #management, sources said. #... #Novell officials declined to comment on unannounced products. #... -- ======== Boyd Johnson nosc!spectra.com!johnson San Diego, Ca. ========
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct27.213511.13641@spectra.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!nosc!spectra!johnsonReferences:
<1992Oct24.192815.8396@super.org> <1992Oct27.174247.11260@cs.uwp.edu> <Oct27.183910.64363@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!nosc!spectra!johnson From: johnson@spectra.com (boyd johnson) Subject: Re: Quality of DR-DOS 6.0 Software and Service Message-ID: <1992Oct27.213511.13641@spectra.com> Organization: Spectragraphics Corporation References: <1992Oct24.192815.8396@super.org> <1992Oct27.174247.11260@cs.uwp.edu> <Oct27.183910.64363@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 92 21:35:11 GMT Lines: 46