Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc
Article #2761Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! vs Windows 3.0 vs NeXT/MACH
From: Ari Juhani Huttunen
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 00:04
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 00:04
12 lines
1261 bytes
1261 bytes
In article <1991May8.190718.12134@watson.ibm.com> larrys@watson.ibm.com (Larry Salomon, Jr.) writes: >(Sigh) This is getting ridiculous now. So you think that NT will provide >this??? NO!!! NT is simply a way of mapping the Windows, OS/2, VMS, and >Dos APIs to a common set of kernal functions. THAT'S IT! Your file >formats will still be as incompatible, etc.. Why not just implement Windows and OS/2 on top of Mach? A(n almost) ready kernel that I've heard is also pretty fast. -- Ari Huttunen To Tuva or nothing! phone: 90-7285944 <Richard Feynman>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ARI.HUTTUNEN.91May14020427@silver-surfer.hut.fi>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!rice!uupsi!sunic!news.funet.fi!funic!santra!santra!Ari.HuttunenReferences:
<066gx8m@rpi.edu> <1991May8.190718.12134@watson.ibm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!rice!uupsi!sunic!news.funet.fi!funic!santra!santra!Ari.Huttunen From: Ari.Huttunen@hut.fi (Ari Juhani Huttunen) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! vs Windows 3.0 vs NeXT/MACH Message-ID: <ARI.HUTTUNEN.91May14020427@silver-surfer.hut.fi> Date: 14 May 91 00:04:27 GMT References: <066gx8m@rpi.edu> <1991May8.190718.12134@watson.ibm.com> Sender: news@santra.uucp (Cnews - USENET news system) Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland Lines: 12 In-Reply-To: larrys@watson.ibm.com's message of 8 May 91 18:58:16 GMT