Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc
Article #2856Re: IBM XT upgrade
From: Leonard Erickson
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 12:41
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 12:41
35 lines
1904 bytes
1904 bytes
slc@a2.cim.cdc.com (Steve Chesney x4662) writes: >At my wife's job (a church) she is obligated to use a vintage IBM XT with >a 10 meg hard disk, color display and IBM PC-DOS 2.10. >Since she is used to our 386, it seems slow to her. Are there any cheap and >simple upgrades that we could try to alleviate this? I am considering: >upgrade to MS-DOS 5.0 Using anything past DOS 3.31 on an XT is just a waste of RAM. There's nothing that DOS 5 can do on an XT that DOS 3.31 can't. And 3.31 uses *noticeably* less RAM. >use of a disk cache Without an EMS board there's nowhere to *put* the cache except in the 640k that everything else is trying to use. So you'd increase the performance at the cost of breaking any RAM hungry software! >Any other ideas? Shop around for an old EMS board. There are a lot of 8-bit only ones that won't run at anything above 8 MHz bus speed. They're often available for under $20 (without ram, but then the 256k chips (or even 64k!!) thery use are *very* cheap) Adding one will give a place for many programs to swap to, and allow you to have things like a cache. The swapping will make a *major* performance difference to any program that can use the EMS! -- Leonard Erickson leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com CIS: [70465,203] 70465.203@compuserve.com FIDO: 1:105/51 Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org (The CIS & Fido addresses are preferred)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec31.124152.8371@qiclab.scn.rain.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!qiclab!leonardReferences:
<50921@shamash.cdc.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!qiclab!leonard From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc Subject: Re: IBM XT upgrade Keywords: XT Message-ID: <1992Dec31.124152.8371@qiclab.scn.rain.com> Date: 31 Dec 92 12:41:52 GMT Article-I.D.: qiclab.1992Dec31.124152.8371 References: <50921@shamash.cdc.com> Reply-To: Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon. Lines: 35