🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc
Article #3142

Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! vs Windows 3.0 vs NeXT/MACH

#3142
From: Mark Towfiq
Date: Thu, 16 May 1991 11:10
25 lines
1791 bytes
Ari.Huttunen@hut.fi (Ari Juhani Huttunen) writes:

Ari> Why not just implement Windows and OS/2 on top of Mach? A(n
Ari> almost) ready kernel that I've heard is also pretty fast.

>>>>> On 14 May 91 15:47:54 GMT, barryf@aix01.aix.rpi.edu (Barry B.
>>>>> Floyd) said:

Barry> Correct me if I am wrong (a request not worth making? :-> ),
Barry> Windows is to PM as DOS is to OS/2. Windows is to NextStep as
Barry> DOS is to Mach. Mach is a Unix compatible (shaky ground?)
Barry> "operating system", supporting multi-user, multi-tasking, etc.
Barry> access to a computing platform.

Basically, except that Mach isn't Unix; Mach itself is a message-based
micro-kernel, on top of which people have put a Unix-compatible OS.
One could also write a DOS on top of Mach, or an OS/2, or a VMS....

In fact, I am hoping that someday (perhaps after the GNU Kernel is
released) someone WILL do this!
--
Mark Towfiq, FTP Software, Inc.                                  towfiq@FTP.COM
Work No.: +1 617 246 0900			      Home No.: +1 617 488 2818

  "The Earth is but One Country, and Mankind its Citizens" -- Baha'u'llah
Technical Details
Message-ID: <TOWFIQ.91May16111015@babyoil.FTP.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!clarkson!grape.ecs.clarkson.edu!towfiq
References: <066gx8m@rpi.edu> <1991May8.190718.12134@watson.ibm.com> <ARI.HUTTUNEN.91May14020427@silver-surfer.hut.fi> <5b_h6k_@rpi.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!clarkson!grape.ecs.clarkson.edu!towfiq
From: towfiq@FTP.COM (Mark Towfiq)
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! vs Windows 3.0 vs NeXT/MACH
Reply-To: towfiq@FTP.COM
Organization: FTP Software, Inc., Wakefield, MA
Date: 16 May 91 11:10:15
Message-ID: <TOWFIQ.91May16111015@babyoil.FTP.COM>
In-Reply-To: barryf@aix01.aix.rpi.edu's message of 14 May 91 15:47:54 GMT
References: <066gx8m@rpi.edu> <1991May8.190718.12134@watson.ibm.com>
 <ARI.HUTTUNEN.91May14020427@silver-surfer.hut.fi> <5b_h6k_@rpi.edu>
Sender: usenet@grape.ecs.clarkson.edu