🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc
Article #3194

Re: Why is erase *.* slower with 4dos.com than with command.com?

#3194
From: Gunnar Dahlstrom
Date: Mon, 20 May 1991 22:03
24 lines
1908 bytes
In article <1991May20.064529.1764@nic.funet.fi> akoivuma@finsun.csc.fi (Antti Koivumaki) writes:
>I have noticed that when I use 4dos.com, erase *.* works much slower than
>when command.com is used. I tested this by erasing 100 files using each.
>I did this on an otherwise empty hard disk partition. The result:
>- using 4dos.com (v. 4.02), erase/q *.* takes about 5 seconds
>- using command.com (of DOS 3.3), erase *.* takes less than 0.5 seconds.

With filehandels you can only delete 1 file. So if you write del *.* 4dos make
a list of all files and execute delete <filename> for every fil there is.
But if you use FCB (wich Microsoft official not support (its a old way to handle
files) but they use it in command.com) you can execute a del *.* if you
use FCB to handels wit your files!

// Gunnar


===============================================================================
				Gunnar Dahlstrom
			Chalmers University of Technology
			    Div. Building Technology
			   412 96 Gothenburg,  Sweden
			E-Mail:  dahlstr@hus.chalmers.se
			  or	 dahlstr@htpc2.hus.chalmers.se
===============================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991May20.220341.28671@afs-news.utc.chalmers.se>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!chalmers.se!afs-news!trout!dahlstr
References: <1991May20.064529.1764@nic.funet.fi>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!chalmers.se!afs-news!trout!dahlstr
From: dahlstr@hus.chalmers.se (Gunnar Dahlstrom)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Why is erase *.* slower with 4dos.com than with command.com?
Message-ID: <1991May20.220341.28671@afs-news.utc.chalmers.se>
Date: 20 May 91 22:03:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: afs-news.1991May20.220341.28671
References: <1991May20.064529.1764@nic.funet.fi>
Sender: news@afs-news.utc.chalmers.se (News System)
Reply-To: dahlstr@hus.chalmers.se ()
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lines: 24