Re: Why is erase *.* slower with 4dos.com than with command.com? - Article 3201 - go-pugleaf

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc

Article #3201

Back to comp.os.msdos.misc Previous Next

Re: Why is erase . slower with 4dos.com than with command.com?

#3201

From: Tom Almy
Date: Tue, 21 May 1991 15:17

9 lines
764 bytes

Just a suggestion if you want a quick erase while running 4dos:

alias qe*rase  command /c erase


-- 
Tom Almy
toma@sail.labs.tek.com
Standard Disclaimers Apply

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9559@sail.LABS.TEK.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekgen!sail!toma

References: <1991May20.064529.1764@nic.funet.fi> <1991May20.143142.16378@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekgen!sail!toma
From: toma@sail.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Why is erase *.* slower with 4dos.com than with command.com?
Message-ID: <9559@sail.LABS.TEK.COM>
Date: 21 May 91 15:17:15 GMT
References: <1991May20.064529.1764@nic.funet.fi> <1991May20.143142.16378@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au>
Reply-To: toma@sail.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message