Re: New DOS(s) Yes, but WHY upgrade?

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc

Article #3367

Back to comp.os.msdos.misc Previous Next

#3367

From: Doug Dougherty
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1991 13:16

10 lines
963 bytes

ins845b@monu4.cc.monash.edu.au (mr  k.l. lentin) writes (in response to
a query as to whether there was any real utility in this new DOS thingie):

>How about an extra 50K+ on a 286 or better! Leaves 630K Free I am told (will
>find out tomorrow when My copy arrives)

Will this really work on a 286 with (only) extended mem?
--

	(Another fine mess brought to you by valley@gsbsun.uchicago.edu)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Jun13.131643.3646@midway.uchicago.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!uwm.edu!linac!midway!gsbsun!valley

References: <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1991Jun13.074906.8024@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!uwm.edu!linac!midway!gsbsun!valley
From: valley@gsbsun.uchicago.edu (Doug Dougherty)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: New DOS(s) Yes, but WHY upgrade?
Keywords: MS-DOS, DR-DOS, 5.0
Message-ID: <1991Jun13.131643.3646@midway.uchicago.edu>
Date: 13 Jun 91 13:16:43 GMT
References: <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1991Jun13.074906.8024@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au>
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (NewsMistress)
Organization: University of Chicago
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message