Re: New DOS(s) Yes, but WHY upgrade?

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc

Article #3386

Back to comp.os.msdos.misc Previous Next

#3386

From: Adams Douglas
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1991 17:51

11 lines
983 bytes

In <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith) writes:

[point by point analysis of why everything MSDOS 5.0 does his system
 already does]

>Can anybody give me a good reason why I should upgrade to DOS 5.0
>from DOS 4.01???  Getting a measly 5k or 10k more base memory is
>NOT worth $60!!!

Then don't buy it. I don't get the impression someone is saying you
_must_ buy it.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Jun14.175133.13190@crash.cts.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!adamsd

References: <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!adamsd
From: adamsd@crash.cts.com (Adams Douglas)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: New DOS(s) Yes, but WHY upgrade?
Keywords: MS-DOS, DR-DOS, 5.0
Message-ID: <1991Jun14.175133.13190@crash.cts.com>
Date: 14 Jun 91 17:51:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: crash.1991Jun14.175133.13190
References: <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message