🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc
Article #3392

Re: New DOS(s) Yes, but WHY upgrade?

#3392
From: Andy Wilks
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 1991 03:56
39 lines
2666 bytes
In article <1991Jun14.025806.14143@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au> ins845b@monu4.cc.monash.edu.au (mr  k.l. lentin) writes:
)In article <1991Jun13.131643.3646@midway.uchicago.edu> valley@gsbsun.uchicago.edu (Doug Dougherty) writes:
)>ins845b@monu4.cc.monash.edu.au (mr  k.l. lentin) writes (in response to
)>a query as to whether there was any real utility in this new DOS thingie):
)>
)>>How about an extra 50K+ on a 286 or better! Leaves 630K Free I am told (will
)>>find out tomorrow when My copy arrives)
)>
)>Will this really work on a 286 with (only) extended mem?
)>--

It sure does... I had 612K available for executable programs on a 286
with 1Mb of RAM!!
After I added SMARTDRV, Norton Filesave and Logitech Mouse Driver I had 
548K free for applications.

)>
)>	(Another fine mess brought to you by valley@gsbsun.uchicago.edu)
)
)Yep, I think they guarantee at least 60K odd on a 286 up. Note only dos will
)go into high mem on a 286. On a 386 it will load your TSR's and drivers too.
)
)
)--
)-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
>|/     (ins845b@monu4.cc.monash.edu.au)  | This space for rent.
>|\evin (ins845b@monu3.cc.monash.edu.au)  | All reasonable offers accepted
>-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------

/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/
*   I don't express opinions, I just follow orders...             (___)   *
/                                                                 (o o)   /
*                              One of the few .sig's ->    /-------\ /    *
/   Andy Wilks                  with ASCII livestock.     / |     ||O     /
*   android@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu                           *  ||,---||      *
/   University of Texas at Austin                           ^^    ^^      /
*   copyright (c) 1934,1942,1961,1990,1991                    BEVO        *
/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/*/
 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <50568@ut-emx.uucp>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
References: <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1991Jun13.074906.8024@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au> <1991Jun13.131643.3646@midway.uchicago.edu> <1991Jun14.025806.14143@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: android@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Andy Wilks)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: New DOS(s) Yes, but WHY upgrade?
Keywords: MS-DOS, DR-DOS, 5.0
Message-ID: <50568@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 15 Jun 91 03:56:21 GMT
References: <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1991Jun13.074906.8024@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au> <1991Jun13.131643.3646@midway.uchicago.edu> <1991Jun14.025806.14143@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: android@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Andy Wilks)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 39