Re: New DOS(s) Yes, but WHY upgrade?

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc

Article #3449

Back to comp.os.msdos.misc Previous Next

#3449

From: homo obsolescensis
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1991 22:15

5 lines
890 bytes

Has anyone tried 5.0 with QRAM/loadhi?  I am currently (dos 3.3)
getting as much as 690K on a 286 with 1 Meg ram (a NEAT machine),
with a bunch of drivers and tsr installed high, and would hate to lose this.

Walter Henry

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Jun20.221531.9977@morrow.stanford.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!lindy.Stanford.EDU!whenry

References: <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1991Jun13.074906.8024@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!lindy.Stanford.EDU!whenry
From: whenry@lindy.Stanford.EDU (homo obsolescensis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: New DOS(s)    Yes, but WHY upgrade?
Keywords: MS-DOS, DR-DOS, 5.0
Message-ID: <1991Jun20.221531.9977@morrow.stanford.edu>
Date: 20 Jun 91 22:15:31 GMT
References: <1991Jun12.170655.7003@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1991Jun13.074906.8024@monu0.cc.monash.edu.au>
Sender: news@morrow.stanford.edu (News Service)
Organization: Stanford University Libraries
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message