Re: SCSI performance / Adaptec vs Seagate

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc

Article #3760

Back to comp.os.msdos.misc Previous Next

#3760

From: "Peter R. Humphrey"
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:31

17 lines
1213 bytes

In article <C1FwFo.G63@jti.com> richb@jti.com (Richard Braun) writes:

>Using a simplistic disk performance test program provided by a drive
>manufacturer, I came up with the following surprising result:
>
>	The 8-bit Seagate ST02 is nearly 3 times faster than the
>	16-bit bus-mastering Adaptec 1542A.
>
>Why might this be?

Let me guess - the test program was published by Seagate?

-- 
Rgds

Peter Humphrey  |  prh@essence.demon.co.uk         | Voice 0932-343158
Woking, UK.     |  unionjack@cix.compulink.co.uk   | Data  0932-353948

Technical Details

Message-ID: <728112718snx@essence.demon.co.uk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!gatech!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!pipex!demon!essence.demon.co.uk!prh

References: <C1FwFo.G63@jti.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.linux,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: prh@essence.demon.co.uk ("Peter R. Humphrey")
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!gatech!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!pipex!demon!essence.demon.co.uk!prh
Subject: Re: SCSI performance / Adaptec vs Seagate
Reply-To: prh@essence.demon.co.uk
References: <C1FwFo.G63@jti.com>
Distribution: world
Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.misc
X-Mailer: cppnews $Revision: 1.30 $
Organization: Organization?  What organization?
Lines: 17
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:31:58 +0000
Message-ID: <728112718snx@essence.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

Reply to Parent Message