Re: DR-DOS

Article View: comp.os.msdos.misc

Article #834

Back to comp.os.msdos.misc Previous Next

#834

From: Timothy Takahashi
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 1990 13:56

11 lines
897 bytes

In article <1121@fang.dsto.oz> hjh@aeg.dsto.oz.au (H.J.Harvey-AEG) writes:
>I have been running DR-DOS V3.41 for several months and have been very pleased
>with it.  Sure, there are a few differences, but the only real problem has
>been its inability to work 100% with PC-NFS.

I've heard of Dr-DOS, but never actually seen anybody run it. What are the
"few differences?" Is it better/faster/smaller than MS-DOS?

Just curious,

tim

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8502@ur-cc.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!sunybcs!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!ttak

References: <1121@fang.dsto.oz>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!sunybcs!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!ttak
From: ttak@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Timothy Takahashi)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Keywords: DRDOS,comments
Message-ID: <8502@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: 20 Jul 90 13:56:56 GMT
References: <1121@fang.dsto.oz>
Reply-To: ttak@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Timothy Takahashi)
Organization: University of Rochester
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message