Thread View: comp.os.msdos.misc
7 messages
7 total messages
Started by Nelson Minar,L08,x640,7776519
Wed, 11 Jul 1990 19:59
Microsoft's XMS spec
Author: Nelson Minar,L08,x640,7776519
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 1990 19:59
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 1990 19:59
17 lines
1081 bytes
1081 bytes
In the neverending quest for a use for my extended memory, I have chanced upon Microsoft's package for XMS - a supposed standard for using extended memory. It looks pretty nifty to program, including an extra 64k segment for free if you know where to ask for it. However, do any applications use it? I am aware that 4DOS 3.0 will swap into XMS, and that this even works.. Any other programs take advantage of it? Is it possible to get XMS and vdisk.sys to coexist? The documentation says no. Is there a RAMdisk program out there for extended memory that will coexist with XMS? Thanks..
Re: Microsoft's XMS spec
Author: Robert D Goodearl
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 1990 14:54
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 1990 14:54
17 lines
1181 bytes
1181 bytes
In article <15173@reed.UUCP> minar@reed.bitnet (Nelson Minar) writes: > >In the neverending quest for a use for my extended memory, I have >chanced upon Microsoft's package for XMS... >However, do any applications use it? >... Is there a RAMdisk program out there for extended memory that >will coexist with XMS? This XMS spec is the basis for himem.sys (the latest version of which is shipped with windows 3.0). The disk cache program smartdrv.sys and the ram disk program ramdrive.sys, which ship with windows 3.0, both are compatible with XMS. I understand that there is a working group of protected mode product houses who are (have?) modifying(ed) the XMS spec so that various protected mode products (ala Windows 3.0 in standard or extended mode, QEMM, etc.) can work together in the same system.
Re: Microsoft's XMS spec
Author: ranjan.dutta
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 1990 00:39
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 1990 00:39
17 lines
934 bytes
934 bytes
In article <15173@reed.UUCP> minar@reed.bitnet (Nelson Minar) writes: > >In the neverending quest for a use for my extended memory, I have > >However, do any applications use it? I am aware that 4DOS 3.0 will >swap into XMS, and that this even works.. Any other programs take > > If you have 386 machine, try Quaterdeck's QEMM386. It comes with loadhi.com and loadhi.sys that let you load device drivers and TSRs in the high memory. Also, it is totally transparent as far as memory allocation is concerned. You could use ramdrives with it. Ranjan
Re: Microsoft's XMS spec
Author: Wolfgang Strobl
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 1990 17:31
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 1990 17:31
21 lines
1180 bytes
1180 bytes
minar@reed.bitnet (Nelson Minar,L08,x640,7776519) writes: >In the neverending quest for a use for my extended memory, I have >chanced upon Microsoft's package for XMS - a supposed standard for >using extended memory. >It looks pretty nifty to program, including an extra 64k segment for >free if you know where to ask for it. >However, do any applications use it? I am aware that 4DOS 3.0 will >swap into XMS, and that this even works.. Any other programs take >advantage of it? >Is it possible to get XMS and vdisk.sys to coexist? The documentation >says no. Is there a RAMdisk program out there for extended memory that >will coexist with XMS? MS Windows 3 uses XMS. And it comes with a RAM disk which uses XMS. Wolfgang Strobl #include <std.disclaimer.hpp>
Re: Microsoft's XMS spec
Author: CJ Pilzer
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 1990 17:05
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 1990 17:05
20 lines
1259 bytes
1259 bytes
In article <15173@reed.UUCP>, minar@reed.bitnet (Nelson Minar,L08,x640,7776519) writes: > > [stuff deleted] I am aware that 4DOS 3.0 will > swap into XMS, and that this even works.. Any other programs take > advantage of it? I am not able to get my 4DOS to swap under MS HIMEN.SYS xms manager, although it works great with 386MAX, but Windows 3.0 won't work with 386MAX and requires HIMEM.SYS. > > Is it possible to get XMS and vdisk.sys to coexist? The documentation > says no. Is there a RAMdisk program out there for extended memory that > will coexist with XMS? > Microsoft recommends in the documentation that came with Windows 3.0, that MS RAMDRIVE.SYS be used with HIMEM.SYS. Both of these came with my ver 4.01 MS DOS, however, the versions which come with Windows 3.0 are later. -- cj
Re: Microsoft's XMS spec
Author: Pasquale Leone
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 1990 22:56
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 1990 22:56
23 lines
1629 bytes
1629 bytes
Many have complained that their program that can use XMS memory
won't work under mswindows 3.0's HIMEM.SYS . This is because windows 3.0
and the new himem.sys does not comply with the XMS (eXtended Memory Spec)
as originally set out by microsoft and as used by MANY other companies.
(Desqview, Rational Systems, 4dos, etc)
They seem to think they can force everybody out of business by setting a
new incompatible "standard".
For those of you who want to know what programs use XMS mem here are some
Desqview, (it uses the first 64kbyte)
any program that uses a dos extender like
the new LOTUS123,
MathLAB286 or 386,
most pcboard routing packages,
XILINX programmable gate array developement software,
Vdisk.sys? (mine seems to work fine under an XMS driver like QEXT.SYS)
Note that there are many,many programs that fall into the middle group
and will NOT run under the new windows 3.0 because of the change to the spec.
They WILL run under Desqview flawlessly. I know, I do it.
Re: Microsoft's XMS spec
Author: Steve Hastings
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 1990 17:54
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 1990 17:54
29 lines
2111 bytes
2111 bytes
In article <10502@ists.ists.ca> pasquale@sgl.ists.ca (Pasquale Leone) writes: > > Many have complained that their program that can use XMS memory >won't work under mswindows 3.0's HIMEM.SYS . This is because windows 3.0 >and the new himem.sys does not comply with the XMS (eXtended Memory Spec) >as originally set out by microsoft and as used by MANY other companies. >(Desqview, Rational Systems, 4dos, etc) >They seem to think they can force everybody out of business by setting a >new incompatible "standard". This is a needless flame. The new HIMEM.SYS is, I believe, compatible with DPMI, the DOS Protected Mode Interface standard. Microsoft has worked with a number of other companies to hammer out a spec that will be open for everyone. (I don't have the list handy, but I remember that both Quarterdeck and Rational Systems were on the DPMI committee.) It's true that the DPMI standard is different from the old DOS extender standards (like VCPI). Microsoft took a lot of criticism for this. But as far as I can tell it was an honest desire to make better software (crashing less often) behind this. Gordon Letwin posted a long and detailed explanation of why VCPI had to go, and why DPMI is better and worthwhile; I wish I had kept a copy. I am not a systems guru and there may be another reason behind this change to HIMEM.SYS. It could even be a screw-up by someone at Microsoft. But I know it is not an attempt to force anyone out of business. -- Steve "I don't speak for Microsoft" Hastings ===^=== ::::: uunet!microsoft!steveha steveha@microsoft.uucp ` \\==|
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads