Porting C to GEOS (Re: Object Assembler)

Article View: comp.os.msdos.pcgeos

Article #1065

Back to comp.os.msdos.pcgeos Previous Next

#1065

From: Shag
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:40

20 lines
1392 bytes

johnm@cory.Berkeley.EDU (John D. Mitchell) writes:

>...developers are customers... 
>developers ... said that C language support is what they want 
>... many people have a body of code (in C) that they want to just port... 

If the C code they have isn't already object-oriented, will it still be
portable?  Will the resultant image be inferior to one generated using
GOC?  Will an image created in GOC be inferior to one generated using
Object Assembler?

(Inferior = bigger, slower, less elegant)

-Shag (Wondering if Brian went to Berkeley, and if so, did he inhale?)

-- 
birchall@pilot.njin.net, shag@glia.biostr.washington.edu, birchall@njin.bitnet
  Operator of ShagNet - Rutgers/NJIN dialup access for Burlington County, NJ
     Happy and informative user of a PPI 14400 FaxModem and GeoWorks Pro
       Editor of the Queensryche E-mail Digest - "Screaming in Digital"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Jan.24.17.40.43.1993.8277@pilot.njin.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!pilot.njin.net!birchall

References:

<1993Jan18.212233.29388@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1993Jan22.204341.23504@exu.ericsson.se> <1993Jan23.194638.1034@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!pilot.njin.net!birchall
From: birchall@pilot.njin.net (Shag)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.pcgeos
Subject: Porting C to GEOS (Re: Object Assembler)
Message-ID: <Jan.24.17.40.43.1993.8277@pilot.njin.net>
Date: 24 Jan 93 22:40:43 GMT
References: <1993Jan18.212233.29388@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1993Jan22.204341.23504@exu.ericsson.se> <1993Jan23.194638.1034@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Organization: Screaming in Digital, the Queensryche Digest
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message