🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug19.235621.4172@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> bx304@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jeff Epler) writes:
>In a previous article, ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) says:
>
>>In article <!00mmbb.messina@netcom.com> messina@netcom.com (Tony Porczyk) writes:
>>The funny side of it is that it is almost predestined that when an
>>MsDos problem is posed some dedicated soul suggests using 4DOS. 
>>(Which, I repeat, is an impressive and useful interpreter, but that
>>still is beside the original question). 
>
>Well I was the guy who was destined to bring it up this time, but I
>*did* still express interest in the way you people would do it..
>
>Which you conveniently failed to quote in your reply.. :)
>-- 
>|Jeff Epler               Additions Welcome           c(-8 ;-) >{8-) |
>| :) (=( =-] (-= Celebrating the variety of faces =-> :^) {-= |-) (: |
>| >X^P                                              Lincoln, Nebraska|

Yes, most certainly, and now duly noted so.

Ok, I'll now do as you wish, but it is not usually a good net
practice to go quoting away the entire postings.  :-) :-) :-)

Tryly.  Don't take anything of this in a negative spirit.  Mine was
an just an observation of a frequent practice, with no ill
intentions.  Please do enjoy both the discussion about 4DOS vs
COMMAND.COM, and the MsDos brain teaser. 

   All the best, Timo

..................................................................
Prof. Timo Salmi
Moderating at garbo.uwasa.fi anonymous FTP archives 128.214.87.1
Faculty of Accounting & Industrial Management; University of Vaasa
Internet: ts@uwasa.fi Bitnet: salmi@finfun   ; SF-65101, Finland