Re: Turbo C++ 3.1 -- does it exist ?

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #1091

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#1091

From: Nigel Roles
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 09:09

12 lines
867 bytes

In article <1992Aug20.181514.9597@uoft02.utoledo.edu> billp@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu (Bill Parquet) writes:

> kestes@nswc-wo.navy.mil (Kent Estes) writes:
> : I've heard that Turbo C++ 3.1 is out.  Is this true ?  If so
> : can anyone tell me what has changed/improved ?
> 
> Not to much (I think) They implemented the C++ standard version 2.1 and
> support for windows 3.1.
> 
> 
That's Borland C++ 3.1 not Turbo C++ 3.1.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <714415476snx@cotswold.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cotswold.demon.co.uk!nigel

References: <1992Aug20.181514.9597@uoft02.utoledo.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
From: nigel@cotswold.demon.co.uk (Nigel Roles)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cotswold.demon.co.uk!nigel
Subject: Re: Turbo C++ 3.1 -- does it exist ?
Distribution: world
References: <1992Aug20.181514.9597@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
Organization: Interconnect
Lines: 12
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 09:09:25 +0000
Message-ID: <714415476snx@cotswold.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@gate.demon.co.uk

Reply to Parent Message