Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #119Re: 1 Meg barrier & TC 2.0, or C++?
From: frampton
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 14:41
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 14:41
20 lines
1487 bytes
1487 bytes
In article <1992Oct30.094216.770@skitzo.dseg.ti.com>, frampton@skitzo.dseg.ti.com writes:
>
>
> With Turbo C 2.0 I have successfully been using the far heap for
> data up to 1 meg of ram. I am troubled that I can't seem to get
> to the ram above 1 meg. Is this the end of my rope? I was hoping
> that Borland C++ will be able to farmalloc above 1 meg. Can it
> happen? This is very disturbing. The data that I am parsing has
> the capability to be quite large at times and I don't wish not to
> be limited to conventional memory.
My mistake... I looked at "mem/c" during a shell and my barrier is
actually 640K not 1 MEG. I thought farmalloc() would see highmem.
Not that I had any blocks left anyway.
Thanx for the replys that suggested Phar Lap.
_________________________________________________________________________
mark frampton....O/30 NOVICE | You can ride as long as you are alive,
frampton@skitzo.dseg.ti.com | as long as you can take the pain.
|
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov3.084155.778@skitzo.dseg.ti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!asuvax!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!skitzo.dseg.ti.com!framptonReferences:
<1992Oct30.094216.770@skitzo.dseg.ti.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!asuvax!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!skitzo.dseg.ti.com!frampton From: frampton@skitzo.dseg.ti.com Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: 1 Meg barrier & TC 2.0, or C++? Message-ID: <1992Nov3.084155.778@skitzo.dseg.ti.com> Date: 3 Nov 92 08:41:55 CST References: <1992Oct30.094216.770@skitzo.dseg.ti.com> Organization: Texas Instruments Component Test Facility Lines: 21