🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <BtxGK6.Dyu@NCoast.ORG> brown@NCoast.ORG (Stan Brown) writes:
>
>In this case, however, both you and Tony missed what IMHO is the most
>important point: the original article omitted quite important facts
>which are in the FAQ.  Disregarding those facts, as the article did, can
>lead to a loss of data on one's hard disk.  The question of whether
>binary should have been posted is nugatory, since the subject was more
>fully covered by the FAQ list.

I think that that (the propagation of incorrect solutions) is part and
parcel of the ban on binary postings.  I.e., the real concern of
unbridled binary postings is that some of the things posted are
dangerous.

So the two ideas are related...

************************************************************************
A note to new readers:  the weasely :-) symbol is frowned upon in this
group.  Any questions, see Phil Gustafson who will gladly rearrange your
diodes for you.
			- From the AFU FAQ -

	- pynq@quads.uchicago.edu, who is still costing the net
	  hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, every time he posts -
************************************************************************