Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #13Re: Extended Mode Programming (80386+)
From: Joe Huffman
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 06:26
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 06:26
24 lines
1527 bytes
1527 bytes
bbrown@infonode.ingr.com (Bailey Brown) writes: >However, Codebuilder has never let me down. A while back Computer Language >magazine compared 32bit C compilers and said CB had the best royalty-free >dos extender. I assume you are referring to the June '92 issue of CL... I just read that article again and I was unable to find where it said that CB had the best DOS extender... Also, that article had a few errors in it. I have corresponded with the author via email (msbaker@astute.com -- found this in the article) and sent him a free copy of FlashTek's X-32VM, but of course he hasn't written any articles since then that I am aware of... Of possible interest to some -- DOSX (previous version of X-32VM from Zortech) supported DPMI before Pharlap did. The article said DOSX did not support DPMI and that Pharlap DPMI was out before anyone else. Also, the article said that Flash Graphics was not supported, this was only true in some early beta releases of Flash Graphics. -- netcom!proto!joe joe@proto.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct28.062609.6220@proto.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!decwrl!decwrl!netcomsv!proto!joeReferences:
<Oct21.181434.82827@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <1992Oct23.190745.28837@proto.com> <1992Oct25.083215.15832@infonode.ingr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!decwrl!decwrl!netcomsv!proto!joe From: joe@proto.com (Joe Huffman) Subject: Re: Extended Mode Programming (80386+) Organization: FlashTek, Inc. Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 06:26:09 GMT Message-ID: <1992Oct28.062609.6220@proto.com> References: <Oct21.181434.82827@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <1992Oct23.190745.28837@proto.com> <1992Oct25.083215.15832@infonode.ingr.com> Lines: 24