Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #1556Re: Which C compiler ?
From: Dave Astels
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 1990 12:58
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 1990 12:58
52 lines
2699 bytes
2699 bytes
In article <2622@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu> barthe@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu (Olivier Barthelemy) writes: >I am looking for a good C compiler, among the mainstream ones : Quick C, >Turbo C or Turbo C ++. Can anyone advise me on which to buy, or direct >me to benchmarks. By all means get a C++ system. I haven't used TC++ (note: no space) but the environment looks good. The profiler sound promising too. Allas no Windows support. I have Zortech C++. I've only used it for a few months, but it seems great. I am eagerly awaiting my upgrade to version 2.1, which promises to be even better. The debugger is wonderful, and there is a C compiler thrown in (common optimiser & back end for both C & C++). The optimiser looks to be very capable. I comes with the standard ANSI C library, as well as some extras (EMM support, both as library routines and a special pointer type; MS mouse support functions; a set of curses-like functions; and a fairly complete graphics library). I was dissappointed with the editor/environment in version 2.0, but 2.1 is supposed to greatly improve this. All the pieces works from the command line as well, so I generally use uEmacs to edit. >I want to use C to write small file manipulation utilities > (stripping/changing control codes...), Why not use SED or AWK (there are MS-DOS versions, including ones from the GNU project) >and for educational purposes. I know that C++ has objects, >and I have a vague idea of what objects are. Is it worth the extra cost, the >few bugs, and the slower performance of TC++ compared to TC 2.0 ? The extra cost should be insignificant. Everything has bugs. Note that Zortech's product has been around for a while. C++ isn't much slower that C (if any, depending on the code). >Do these compiler come with good libraries ? As I said above, Zortech comes with a fairly complete library. >Is anyone better for Windows programming ? Zortech supports Windows development. >Thanks for your help No problem. -- "I liked him better before he died" - McCoy, ST V =============================================================================== Dave Astels | Internet: 880716a@AcadiaU.CA PO Box 835, Wolfville, | Bitnet: 880716a@Acadia
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Jul10.125819.18573@aucs.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.dal.ca!aucs!880716aReferences:
<2622@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.dal.ca!aucs!880716a From: 880716a@aucs.uucp (Dave Astels) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: Which C compiler ? Message-ID: <1990Jul10.125819.18573@aucs.uucp> Date: 10 Jul 90 12:58:19 GMT References: <2622@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu> Reply-To: 880716a@aucs.UUCP (Dave Astels) Organization: School of Computer Science, Acadia Univ., Nova Scotia Lines: 52