Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #1559Re: Difference between newsgroups
From: rja
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 1990 11:36
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 1990 11:36
15 lines
1187 bytes
1187 bytes
As the manager/initiator of the PC reorganisation that created comp.os.msdos.programmer, I feel that why we have alt.msdos.programmer as well as the above group. Any group in alt.* is not part of the official USENET, while groups in comp, sci, soc, talk, news, and rec are in USENET proper. Many sites don't get ALTnet and when the reorganisation happened it was felt that a regular MS-DOS programmer group was needed. Someone on ALTnet would have to rmgroup the ALT.* group since it isn't part of USENET. The topics for discussion are identical and I hope that the ALTnet folks will eventually remove their group now that an equivalent USENET group with better distribution has been created.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9007111136.AA00535@edison.CHO.GE.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!edison.cho.ge.com!rjaReferences:
<23300@boulder.Colorado.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!edison.cho.ge.com!rja From: rja@edison.cho.ge.com (rja) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: Difference between newsgroups Message-ID: <9007111136.AA00535@edison.CHO.GE.COM> Date: 11 Jul 90 11:36:24 GMT References: <23300@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: rja <rja@edison.cho.ge.com> Organization: GE-Fanuc North America Lines: 15