Re: Windows 3.0 vs DesqView 2.26 (long)

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #1728

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#1728

From: ross boylan
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 1990 23:51

8 lines
792 bytes

A previous message talked about how fast desqview tasks perform in the
foreground v. the background.  Actually, you can arrange any division
you want, and you can alter this on the fly.  You can also give the
foreground task almost 100% of the CPU.

I think Windows 3 has a similar capability, but I expect it has a
higher overhead.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <52654@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!silver!boylanr

References: <1990Jul28.163656.12359@water.waterloo.edu> <1166@manta.NOSC.MIL>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!silver!boylanr
From: boylanr@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (ross boylan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Windows 3.0 vs DesqView 2.26 (long)
Keywords: GUI, Windows, DesqView.
Message-ID: <52654@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 30 Jul 90 23:51:42 GMT
References: <1990Jul28.163656.12359@water.waterloo.edu> <1166@manta.NOSC.MIL>
Sender: news@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message