Re: This can't be a TurboC bug can it?

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #1767

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#1767

From: Tom Wiencko
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 1990 20:22

21 lines
1307 bytes

CRN@BYUVM.BITNET writes:

>   One quick question:  Have you noticed a great speed difference
>between your code that was compiled using register optimization as
>opposed to your code compiled without such optimization?

I never really noticed much difference, even though the code I was writing
is pretty CPU intensive stuff, and I was running it on a 386SX - not 
really a speed demon.  In general, I am singularly unimpressed with 
any of the optimization I have seen in anybody's micro compilers.  Too
bad, since they have had ample time to get it right.

>  P.S.  Tom, I'm serious about that dinner invitation.  If you're ever

Never been to Provo, but if I get there, I'll at least call and say "hi."

Tom

-- 
Tom Wiencko                                            (w) (404) 977-4515
gatech!stiatl!tom                                  Wiencko & Associates, Inc.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10367@stiatl.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!emory!stiatl!tom

References: <1990Jul30.050221.29945@caen.engin.umich.edu> <90213.121121CRN@BYUVM.BITNET>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!emory!stiatl!tom
From: tom@stiatl.UUCP (Tom Wiencko)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: This can't be a TurboC bug can it?
Message-ID: <10367@stiatl.UUCP>
Date: 2 Aug 90 20:22:00 GMT
References: <1990Jul30.050221.29945@caen.engin.umich.edu> <90213.121121CRN@BYUVM.BITNET>
Organization: Wiencko & Associates, Inc.
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message