🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #2072

Re: TASM bug? (no, not at all)

#2072
From: Duncan Murdoch
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 1990 01:35
12 lines
1158 bytes
In article <2953@amc-gw.amc.com> jwbirdsa@europa.amc.com (James Birdsall) writes:
>   There's also MOVZX, an obscure instruction that is available on all 80x86.
>It will extend a byte to a word, zeroing the high byte. I don't know how the
>execution time compares to an XOR/MOV pair, but I suspect it is faster.
>   Unfortunately, the complementary instruction (MOVSX, move with sign
>extend) is only available on the 386.

MOVZX is only available in TASM in 386 mode, and doesn't seem to work on my
8086.  Is there some special encoding that TASM doesn't know about to get
it to work there, or do you mean all 80x86 except mine?

Duncan Murdoch
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1990Sep5.013539.22227@maytag.waterloo.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!maytag!watstat.waterloo.edu!dmurdoch
References: <4691@bdt.UUCP> <38580@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <2953@amc-gw.amc.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!maytag!watstat.waterloo.edu!dmurdoch
From: dmurdoch@watstat.waterloo.edu (Duncan Murdoch)
Subject: Re: TASM bug? (no, not at all)
Message-ID: <1990Sep5.013539.22227@maytag.waterloo.edu>
Sender: daemon@maytag.waterloo.edu (Admin)
Organization: University of Waterloo
References: <4691@bdt.UUCP> <38580@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <2953@amc-gw.amc.com>
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 90 01:35:39 GMT
Lines: 14