Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #2201Re: Which C compiler: TC or MS?
From: Kai-Uwe Rommel
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 1990 11:24
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 1990 11:24
24 lines
1539 bytes
1539 bytes
In article <4641@feldspar30.UUCP> nellis@motcid.UUCP (Michael R. Nellis) writes: >I am looking to purchase a 'C' compiler. >anyone have any words of wisdom for me? Does I know both Compilers (but not TC++) and I am using C 6.00 now. MS C is more powerfull. It's not some spot features, it's the overall functionality. Also, it allows development for MS Windows (with SDK) and OS/2 and OS/2 PM (without additional SDK!). Optimization is better. This costs it's price: much more used disk space and it is slow. I have tried a TC 1.0 long time ago and had problems compiling sources from Unix systems, MS C 5.1 was more reliable at this time. But this may have changed for TC 2.0 now, but I doubt. If you plan to use OS/2 in the future, it is probably better to get MS C now. Kai Uwe Rommel -- /* Kai Uwe Rommel * Munich * rommel@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de */
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4552@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!midway!ncar!asuvax!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!ira.uka.de!fauern!lan!rommelReferences:
<4641@feldspar30.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!midway!ncar!asuvax!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!ira.uka.de!fauern!lan!rommel From: rommel@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de (Kai-Uwe Rommel) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: Which C compiler: TC or MS? Keywords: TC or MS C Compiler Message-ID: <4552@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> Date: 20 Sep 90 11:24:21 GMT References: <4641@feldspar30.UUCP> Sender: news@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de Reply-To: rommel@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de (Kai-Uwe Rommel) Distribution: comp Organization: Inst. fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen, W. Germany Lines: 24