Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #2346Which Compiler: MSC or TC? - Results
From: Michael R. Nellis
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 1990 12:06
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 1990 12:06
15 lines
1113 bytes
1113 bytes
I would like to thank all who responded, both to myself directly and to the net so all may be enlightened. I received about 10 responses to my cry for information. TurboC was recommended by an overwhelming margin. I got NO responses from persons who prefer MSC. The only two things going for MSC, it seems, is that it supports Windows (which it had better), and that it generates more compact code, in most cases. All other factors seem to be with Borland. Since I do not own Windows, I do not need the Windows support. I have now ordered the Turbo C++ Professional development package and am eagerly awaiting its arrival. Thank you again to all who responded.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4663@feldspar30.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!motcid!nellisShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!motcid!nellis From: nellis@motcid.UUCP (Michael R. Nellis) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Which Compiler: MSC or TC? - Results Summary: TurboC Seems To Be the Favorite Keywords: Compiler Results Message-ID: <4663@feldspar30.UUCP> Date: 24 Sep 90 12:06:21 GMT Distribution: comp Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Div., Arlington Heights, IL Lines: 15