Re: Which C compiler: TC or MS?

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #2532

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#2532

From: Bernie Roehl
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 1990 21:02

11 lines
1019 bytes

In article <4552@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> rommel@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de (Kai-Uwe Rommel) writes:
>[in C 6.00...] Optimization is better.

It's also broken.  Stay away from optimization switches (certainly on 5.00,
probably on 6.00).

-- 
	Bernie Roehl, University of Waterloo Electrical Engineering Dept
	Mail: broehl@watserv1.waterloo.edu OR broehl@watserv1.UWaterloo.ca
	BangPath: {allegra,decvax,utzoo,clyde}!watmath!watserv1!broehl
	Voice:  (519) 885-1211 x 2607 [work]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Oct3.210211.1654@watserv1.waterloo.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att!watmath!watserv1!broehl

References: <4641@feldspar30.UUCP> <4552@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att!watmath!watserv1!broehl
From: broehl@watserv1.waterloo.edu (Bernie Roehl)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Which C compiler: TC or MS?
Keywords: TC or MS C Compiler
Message-ID: <1990Oct3.210211.1654@watserv1.waterloo.edu>
Date: 3 Oct 90 21:02:11 GMT
References: <4641@feldspar30.UUCP> <4552@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de>
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Waterloo
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message