🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #2690

Re: MS/PC DOS 3.3 vs 4.? (which is better?)

#2690
From: Steve Windsor
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 1990 13:10
12 lines
935 bytes
Some thoughts on DOS 4.01 (Note, NOT DOS 4.00!):

Norton Utilities 4.5+ works with large partitions just fine.

Fastback Plus v2.01 - v2.10 work fine also.

Just leave out the DOS shell (Windows 3.0 does a much better job of it)

Yes, the command shell takes up more space, but not that much more...and
if you need that much memory, you should be exploring other options anyway.

Stephen Windsor srw@cci632.UUCP
Technical Details
Message-ID: <40765@cci632.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!cci632!srw
References: <1990Oct15.025303.6582@odetics.com> <1990Oct15.161647.13729@Octopus.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!cci632!srw
From: srw@cci632.UUCP (Steve Windsor)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: MS/PC DOS 3.3 vs 4.? (which is better?)
Message-ID: <40765@cci632.UUCP>
Date: 16 Oct 90 13:10:16 GMT
References: <1990Oct15.025303.6582@odetics.com> <1990Oct15.161647.13729@Octopus.COM>
Reply-To: srw@cci632.UUCP (Steve Windsor)
Distribution: na
Organization: CCI, Communications Systems Division, Rochester, NY
Lines: 12