Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #2701Re: MS/PC DOS 3.3 vs 4.? (which is better?)
From: Steve Hastings
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 1990 18:20
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 1990 18:20
17 lines
1356 bytes
1356 bytes
In article <58280@microsoft.UUCP> steveha@microsoft.UUCP (Steve Hastings) writes: >DOS 4.x uses a 16-bit FAT, so it can support very large disks indeed. Oops! Back to school with me. DOS 3.x had a 16-bit FAT, and still could only have 32MB partitions. The DOS internal "block number" was limited to 16 bits in DOS 3.x and was the source of the 32MB limit (64k of sectors times 0.5k per sector = 32MB). In DOS 4.x, that number is increased to 32 bits, allowing DOS to count up to four billion sectors (an impractically large number). Sorry about that, folks. I bet the DOS developers are laughing at me now. Anyway, if you are interested in the gory details of DOS, read the "Disk Companion" chapter in the Norton Utilities 5.0 "Disk Explorer" manual. -- Steve "I don't speak for Microsoft" Hastings ===^=== ::::: uunet!microsoft!steveha steveha@microsoft.uucp ` \\==|
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<58308@microsoft.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!microsoft!stevehaReferences:
<1990Oct15.025303.6582@odetics.com> <58280@microsoft.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!microsoft!steveha From: steveha@microsoft.UUCP (Steve Hastings) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: MS/PC DOS 3.3 vs 4.? (which is better?) Message-ID: <58308@microsoft.UUCP> Date: 17 Oct 90 18:20:39 GMT References: <1990Oct15.025303.6582@odetics.com> <58280@microsoft.UUCP> Reply-To: steveha@microsoft.UUCP (Steve Hastings) Distribution: na Organization: Microsoft International Products Group Lines: 17